<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why “is this fascism?” is the wrong question: a foray into the everyday life of political concepts	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2021/03/10/why-is-this-fascism-is-the-wrong-question-a-foray-into-the-everyday-life-of-political-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2021/03/10/why-is-this-fascism-is-the-wrong-question-a-foray-into-the-everyday-life-of-political-concepts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dmf		</title>
		<link>/2021/03/10/why-is-this-fascism-is-the-wrong-question-a-foray-into-the-everyday-life-of-political-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-4878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anthrodendum.org/?p=6705#comment-4878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[generally sympathetic to this kind of reminder that meaning is in use and that we should avoid reification but have serious questions about &quot;What anthropologists have to offer to the debates around American fascism are fine-grained accounts of patterns of use&quot; how fine-grained can such investigations be, how much context is needed to grasp any localized event, and how much can one then generalize from any such sampling? Seems more of a de-constructive value to be had in any such examination of what&#039;s actually occuring than a constructive one that can serve the public/common good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>generally sympathetic to this kind of reminder that meaning is in use and that we should avoid reification but have serious questions about &#8220;What anthropologists have to offer to the debates around American fascism are fine-grained accounts of patterns of use&#8221; how fine-grained can such investigations be, how much context is needed to grasp any localized event, and how much can one then generalize from any such sampling? Seems more of a de-constructive value to be had in any such examination of what&#8217;s actually occuring than a constructive one that can serve the public/common good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
